From Factory Floors to Software Stacks: Why OSS Risk Now Mirrors Physical Supply Chain Threats

Author: Rod Cobain • 5 min read

In the original piece, Mike Dwyer painted a vivid picture: Manufacturing Supply Chains Are No Longer Just Mechanical or Logistical Systems, they are deeply entwined digital ecosystems, where each ERP module, IoT-enabled actuator, and tier-2 supplier nodes can become an entry point for cyber threats. Logistics Matters Today, I want to push the conversation further: the open source software (OSS) layer now acts like a silent “sub-supplier” embedded within your tech stack, and like any hidden supply risk, it demands boardroom attention, not just the care of the development team. The risk of ignoring this is not just to your business but that of your customer and their suppliers.

Recasting Mike Dwyer: Resilience Is About More Than Hardware

The core message from Mike remains pivotal:

  • Cyber risk is business risk, it must be integrated across operations, procurement, R&D and logistics. How many times does this need to be repeated?
  • Legacy point solutions are no longer sufficient, resilience must be designed globally across tiers. This is a leadership situation.
  • Next-generation supply chains rely on intelligence, visibility, and agility,  but every “smart” layer you add is a new attack surface.

What often goes unsaid,  and is less visible to many manufacturers,  is how much of the “smarts” in these systems is built on open source software components. Every subsystem, from sensor drivers to data analytics modules,  often leverages OSS libraries. Thus, the same supply chain logic Mike describes must apply internally: your software dependencies are now your internal “suppliers.”

Meterian’s Warning: OSS Is Not Free from Risk. It’s a Source of Escalation Regardless of the business Size or Sector

Escalation Through the OSS Layer: A Multi-Tier Threat Model

Let’s examine how OSS risk can escalate, step by step, through any business sector:

  1. Developer/Subsystem Level
     A team integrates a third-party open source library (e.g. for analytics, messaging, or edge compute). Unknown to them, one of its transitive dependencies includes a known CVE.
     → That module becomes a foothold vulnerable to exploitation.
  2. Application/Subsystem Aggregation
     The vulnerable component is embedded in a subsystem (e.g. quality tracking, process control) that exposes APIs or networked endpoints. Attackers exploit the library flaw to gain code execution or escalate privileges.
     → What was a discreet bug becomes a path into a critical sub-system.
  3. Platform / Middleware / Integration Layer
     Multiple subsystems feed into central integration layers (e.g. MES, orchestration, data middleware). A malicious actor moved laterally from one compromised subsystem into the integration fabric.
     → The exploit travels across domains, bridging OT/IT boundaries.
  4. Control Systems / OT / Physical Assets
     From the integration layer, attackers may reach OT systems controlling PLCs, robotics, or sensors. Here lies real operational impact, production halts, manipulated outputs, or safety risks.
     → The breach translates into physical damage or downtime.
  5. Supply Chain / Partner Ecosystem
     If that platform is shared, or upstream/downstream partners rely on shared components, the exploit can spread further. A single OSS vulnerability could cascade throughout the partner network.
     → The domain of the breach finally becomes systemic, affecting multiple actors.

At each layer, the “supplier” is the embedded code you didn’t write, and if you haven’t been continuously verifying its integrity, the risk is already live.

Practical Steps: Embedding OSS Governance into Your Resilience Strategy

To fuse Mike Dwyer’s vision and Meterian’s warnings into actionable posture, here are recommendations:

FocusActions
Treat OSS like any other supplierMaintain an SBOM (software bill of materials) for all systems. Demand “security assurances” (e.g. scans, patches) from internal and third-party teams.
Integrate continuous SCA / vulnerability scanningEmbed tools like Meterian (or similar) into CI/CD pipelines such that builds with failing security scores are automatically flagged or blocked.
Prioritize remediation, not just detectionUse auto-remediation where possible, or triage by threat score, to avoid alert fatigue and ensure action. Meterian helps with guided upgrade paths.
Cross-functional awareness & trainingEmpower developers, ops, procurement, and leadership with visibility into OSS risk, and grant them the agency to act.
Threat modelling spanning software supply chainExtend your existing supply chain risk models to include internal “supplier layers” (OSS, SDKs) as nodes in your attack graphs.
Incident playbooks that assume internal code riskIn response planning, simulate OSS vulnerability scenarios, not just network intrusion, because in many modern attacks, the initial vector is a library exploit.

Final Thought: Resilience Demands Depth, Not Just Perimeter

Mike Dwyer’s assertion remains apt: supply chain security is business security. But the conversation must now extend inward: the OSS layer, once viewed as a cost-saver or innovation enabler, is a core battleground. Its risks escalate upward. A vulnerability at the bottom can ripple all the way to the executive level, halting production lines or worse.

It’s time to shift from reactive patching to anticipatory governance. Treat code like any other critical supplier, inspect it, test it, govern it, and don’t let your next downtime be the moment you realize the invisible layer was your greatest weakness. Are you aware that the UK Cyber Framework is in the spotlight and is seen as the standard to follow?

Stop ignoring the silent supplier. It’s time to manage your Open Source Risk in the modern supply chain and manufacturing tech stack. 

From Factory Floors to Software Stacks: Why OSS Risk Now Mirrors Physical Supply Chain Threats

Closing the Cyber Insurance Gap

Why Open-Source Scanning & Monitoring Are the Real Safety Net

3 minutes

Cyber insurance is the latest addition to the arsenal of tools in the fight against cyber-attacks, alongside Cyber Essentials and Pen Testing. Both in the business world and private life, we rely on insurance to cover day to day events  that disrupt our lives, but that safety net does not always meet expectations. The recent experiences of Jaguar Land Rover and the Co-op prove what many risk leaders already suspect: today’s cyber policies are riddled with exclusions and caveats that leave businesses exposed when it matters most.

In 2025 alone, we’ve seen:

Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) suffered a crippling cyberattack in September, shutting down production lines and disrupting suppliers worldwide.

  • Without a finalised cyber insurance policy, JLR is left absorbing the financial and operational fallout.
  • The Co-op, still reeling from its April cyber incident, disclose £206 million in lost revenue and an £80 million operating profit hit– much of which fell outside traditional insurance coverage.

Both stories highlight the same painful truth: insurance pays after the damage, if at all. Prevention pays every single time

A group of professionals seated around a conference table analyzing data on laptops and monitors, with red warning graphics displayed, emphasizing the message about cyber insurance and open-source monitoring.

The Fine Print of Cyber Insurance: What’s Not Covered

Insurers are increasingly cautious, excluding or limiting coverage in ways that reduce meaningful protection:

  • State-backed exclusions: Attacks deemed “nation-state” or “warlike” are carved out, leaving businesses to shoulder catastrophic losses.
  • Supply-chain blind spots: Most policies cover only direct IT damage, not the ripple effects when suppliers, logistics providers, or cloud vendors go dark.
  • Sublimits & carve-outs: Crisis PR, forensic costs, and even some business interruption claims often fall under restrictive sublimits.
  • Attribution battles: Proving causation can delay payouts for months, while revenue, reputation, and customer trust evaporate in days.

Why Open-Source Scanning & Monitoring Changes the Game

Insurance alone is not a resilience strategy. The real advantage comes from detecting, patching, and preventing threats before they escalate into claims. That’s where open-source scanning and monitoring deliver unparalleled value:

  • Transparency at scale: Unlike closed systems, open-source tools are frequently reviewed, tested, and enhanced by global communities, which means vulnerabilities have greater probability to be spotted and addressed by a larger community before they can be exploited.
  • Supply-chain visibility: Open-source monitoring illuminates risks across your ecosystem, from third-party code to vendor dependencies, directly addressing the blind spots excluded by insurance policies.
  • Cost-effective coverage: Deploying open-source scanning costs a fraction of insurance premiums, yet continuously reduces exposure, lowering both the frequency and severity of incidents.
  • Proactive compliance: Continuous monitoring demonstrates active governance, satisfying regulators, insurers, and boards while strengthening claims positions if an event does occur.
  • Actionable insights, not afterthoughts: Real-time alerts allow IT and security teams to act before attackers exploit weaknesses–something insurance simply can’t offer that.

Case Studies Reinforced: What JLR & Co-op Teach Us

  • Jaguar Land Rover’s disruption shows how missing insurance leaves organisations financially stranded. But even if cover had been in place, insurers likely would have contested or capped payouts under supply-chain or nation-state exclusions. Open-source monitoring could have identified weak points in advance, preventing stoppages before they cascaded through factories.
  • Illustrating the £206 million scale of business interruption, the Co-op’s loss shows that continuous monitoring would have been a better defense. Closing exploited vulnerabilities early would have shrunk the financial damage and allowed the company to bypass the time-consuming and ultimately low-yield fight over insurance claims.

Industry Recommendation: Build a Dual Shield

The modern cyber risk landscape demands a two-pronged defence.  This means having insurance to handle financial aftershocks, and moreover strategically deploying open-source scanning and monitoring to achieve real-time resilience by closing the specific exposure gaps that insurance explicitly leaves open.

In 2025, the winners won’t be those with the biggest insurance policy, but those who combine smart financial protection with relentless, transparent, and scalable monitoring.

Open-source scanning is far beyond a technical choice; it is a strategic investment. It empowers boards, reassures investors, and proves to regulators and customers that resilience is a measurable commitment, not just a buzzword.

Don’t just insure your cyber risk.  Shrink it–and maximise your operational stability.

Closing the Cyber Insurance Gap